1192
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Five@slrpnk.net to c/usa@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xXSirDanglesXx@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Well with ±400 million guns circulating nationwide, and one in three people are gun owners, consider how many of them would use them in defense of the current government now. There's a reason behind allowing 2A to go unchecked, when in the time it was written, it made sense. Now it's a civilian army that, while keeping the population divided, a not insubstantial percentage will blindly defend any unjust actions this government decides to perpetrate.

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

This. This kind of unchecked gun permissions only elevate the necessary revolt to a civil war. It doesn't help fighting against regimes, on the contrary; it makes the fight extremely bloody. Those who wrote it in 17-something couldn't know that, in the future, it will be the very fascist supporters who are the most heavily armed.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
1192 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3186 readers
841 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS