153
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Australia has passed a groundbreaking ban on social media use for children under 16, the strictest of its kind globally.

Platforms like X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and Reddit have one year to implement the age limit, with fines up to AU$50M for non-compliance.

Supporters cite mental health concerns, while critics argue the ban risks isolation for marginalized youth, lacks proper research, and excludes harmful platforms like 4chan.

Privacy concerns surround proposed age-verification methods. Opponents, including parents, scholars, and tech companies, argue the legislation is rushed and poorly designed, potentially exacerbating existing issues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago

So your complaint is the bill doesn’t go far enough? It should ban more things?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'm, generally, skeptical of the efficacy of any such ban. But if a ban is going to be in place, 4chan et co seem like they should be pretty high fucking priorities to close off to kids. It's like declaring a ban on beer for health reasons, but clarifying that unregulated backwoods moonshine a step away from wood alcohol is still 100% kosher.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago

So you admit this is a good start? 4chan isn’t particularly popular anymore, btw. I’m guessing that’s why it flew under the radar.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

But that's exactly the problem, right?

Social media platforms, forums and other online social spaces wax and wane on popularity. New ones are turning up all the time. This won't prevent kids from socializing online, it'll just force them to do it in the least safe places. Even if you try to regulate every online social space, it'll just turn into a game of whack a mole.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

So we should legalize stabbings because otherwise people will turn to “even worse” forms of violence? Surely there must be a simpler and less moronic approach to legislation.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Should we legalize or decriminalize most drugs, create safe injection sites, and treat addiction as a medical rather than a criminal issue?

Yes. That's exactly what the experts recommend.

And that is no more an argument for my point than your comparison is an argument against it.

Analogies are not load bearing. They illustrate an argument, they don't make it.

You haven't provided an argument. Only an analogy, which on its own is worthless.

And, for the record, when you do figure out what your argument is, you'll have to share it with someone else, because if you're firing right off with "moronic" then there's clearly nothing fruitful to be gained from me actually discussing this with you in good faith.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

News

23413 readers
2182 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS